====== Contingency Tables ======
A contingency is obtained when by crossing two qualitatives nominal variables, typically artifacts type and archaeological assemblage.
Let's assume we have a data.frame object named ''MyData''. Each line corresponds to an artifact. The first column contains a label, the second the assemblage and the last the artifact type :
label assemblage type
CLXIV-001 CL XIV 5+6 t
CLXIV-002 CL XIV 3+4 plh
... ... ...
**''R''** provides two functions for computing contingency table, here assemblage against type:
MyCrossTable <- table(MyData[,2], MyData[,3])
an alternative :
MyCrossTable2 <- xtabs(~., NMB_2006[,c(1,6)] )
The latter can be used as argument to the ''corresp()'' function from the MASS package which computes correspondence analysis, a factorial data reduction method suitable for contingency tables.
==== Frequency Tables ====
The ''prop.table()'' function calculates the frequency table (percentages). Its first argument is an objet of class table. The second is the margin : 1 for row, 2 for columns.
MyCrosFreq <- prop.table(MyCrossTable, 1)
Here is an example :
TYPE_REC_
PHASE type 1 type 2 type 3 type 4
1 0.29242348 0.2506487 0.1904153 0.2665125
2 0.44952914 0.2752219 0.1045417 0.1707073
3 0.00000000 0.5199755 0.1823170 0.2977075
4 0.13439854 0.5759938 0.1875329 0.1020748
5 0.07930212 0.1942093 0.1844235 0.5420651
6 0.14209591 0.2609925 0.1652278 0.4316838
==== Plotting ====
Now we can plot our frequency table. A graphical representation allows us to have a feel of the trends, even if there are many artifacts types and assemblages.
A common and popular way to represent a frequency table is Ford's Battleship diagram. Is is derived from the barplot.
Here is a code that implements it (Jammet-Reynal, 2006):
ford <- function(x, cex.row.labels=1) {
#################################################
## FORD'S "BATTLESHIP" DIAGRAM ##
## Loic JAMMET-REYNAL, may 2006 ##
## Departement d'Anthropologie et d'Ecologie ##
## University of Geneva ##
## jammetr1[at]etu.unige.ch ##
#################################################
dim(x)[2] -> jmax # colonnes j
dim(x)[1] -> imax # lignes i
set.up <- function(xlim, ylim) {
# setting up coord. system
plot( xlim, # x
ylim, # y
type="n", # no plotting
axes = FALSE,
asp = NA,
xlab = "",
ylab = "")
}
## initialisation du device
## on divise par le nombre de colonnes + 1
## 1ere colonne : labels
op <- par(mfrow=c(1, jmax+1), mar=c(5,0,2,0))
# labels des lignes (colonne 1)
set.up(c(0,1), # x
c(0.9, imax+1.10) ) # y
for (i in 1:imax) {
text(0.5,
i+0.5,
row.names(x)[i],
font = 2, # boldface
cex = cex.row.labels)
}
for (j in 1:jmax) { # colonnes j
set.up(xlim = c(-60,60)*max(x), # x
ylim = c(0.9, imax+1.10) ) # y
title(sub=colnames(x)[j],
font.sub=2, # boldface
cex.sub = 1.5)
for (i in 1: imax) { # lignes i
# le plus important. boite multipliee
# par les parametres
X <- c(-50,+50,+50,-50,-50)*x[i,j]
Y <- c(i,i,i+1,i+1,i)
polygon(X,
Y,
xpd=FALSE,
col="black",
mar=c(0,0,0,0) )
}
}
}
You first have to run the above code. A new function called ''ford()'' will be available. Its argument is a frequency table.
In order to represent a chronological hypothesis, you have to rearrange the order of rows and columns. A way to do it is giving two a vector of indices between brackets right after the frequency table object:
ford(MyCrosFreq[c(1,2,4,3), c(2,4,5,3,1,6)])
You can obtain optimal ordering by use of [[seriation]] techniques.
This is an output example :
{{ford.png?600|Ford diagram}}
==== Reference ====
**Jammet-Reynal, L. (2006).-** //La céramique de Clairvaux VII (Jura, France) : typologie, étude quantitative et sériation.// Genève : Département d'anthropologie et d'écologie de l'Université. Unpublished Master thesis.